Henn's merge into Dagobert was on an already RLed profile, so would not have created hours of work. That is precisely the function of the Relationship Lock.
https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=85866185890
Henn's merge into Dagobert was on an already RLed profile, so would not have created hours of work. That is precisely the function of the Relationship Lock.
https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=85866185890
it was originally the same snippet of 40 generations..
the excerpt comes from l'UNDO of
https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=85866378830 (merged 20 minutes after)
there were merge requests for scattered throughout the Middle Ages for 800 years,
You're right! not hours!! not even days, certainly not weeks or months,
they would remain unfinished merge conflicts for years.. without the timely intervention of @ Erica
hi, user Private User
No sorry you can't duplicate the whole Middle Ages in Polish and then merge it, polishing it all.
PLZ Erica Howton need "a pair" of UNDO
-https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=85870475120
-https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=85870475600
From my merge center (June 21, 2024):
https://www.geni.com/search/matches?id=6000000000796878913&src=profile&cmp=btn (Matilda Egerton) the other side has all inactive managers.
This profile: Sir William Lovelace, of Lovelace Place
appears to be an erroneous, unsourced dupe of Sir William Lovelace, of Woolwich
Private User - fixed the Lovelaces.
There may be more issues with the tree, it’s been a while since I, at least, looked at it. So spin off discussion at https://www.geni.com/discussions/280469?msg=1707687
From my merge center (June 22):
https://www.geni.com/search/matches?id=6000000003649650035&src=profile&cmp=btn (John de Domville, Lord of Brinstage and Oxton) The other side added today. The new profile adds a son with a stick-and-spouse tree.
The next possible tree match is https://www.geni.com/search/matches?id=6000000206706412842&src=profile&cmp=btn (Thomas John Millington (old) vs Thomas John Millington (new))
new tree from yesterday. It seems to go back to the 1100s with just single names from here. ancester comparison
https://www.geni.com/list/ancestors/6000000000629616788?compare_id=...
side by side
https://www.geni.com/merge/compare/6000000000629616788?return=match...
I found a different duplicate (one from 2010) nearby. The names match, but the data start getting out of sync going backwards on some.
https://www.geni.com/merge/compare/6000000003086732375 .
It says that the 2010 profiles don't have a path, but then it doesn't say they are isolated. Have they just been sitting about in near 1300 for 14 years waiting for a ride?
https://www.geni.com/search/matches?id=6000000003468251024&src=profile&cmp=btn (Sir James Dent, Kt.) The other side added in 2023 with siblings that are not on the master profile.
https://www.geni.com/search/matches?id=6000000206847077826&src=profile&cmp=btn (Richard Wrottesley, Esq.) The other side added June 27 with 8 of the 10 children.
Unfortunately, https://www.geni.com/search/matches?id=6000000206847077826&src=profile&cmp=btn was completed by the user who created the match. However, his wife and some of the children have duplicates.
I will NOT deal with any of the duplicates.
In looking at the family of Richard Wrottesley, Esq. I found where the family continued toward the current time - Eleanor Long (posted in 2010) vs Eleanor Long (MP).
It starts at the top here, and everything below the 7th generation is a "different tree":
https://www.geni.com/merge/compare/6000000006444239948?to=600000020...
Sir Thomas Griffin, Knight
Sir Thomas Allen Griffin
Elizabeth Griffin
Elizabeth Latimer
_____________________________________________
1. Sir Thomas Allen Griffin b. 1330; d. 1360
└ +Elizabeth Latimer b. 1335; d. 1417
2. Richard Griffin b. 1360; d. 1411
└ +Unknown
3. Nicholas Griffin b. 1390; d. 1436
└ +Unknown
4. Nicholas Griffin b. 1426; d. 1482
└ +Unknown
5. John Richard Griffin b. 1450; d. 1485
└ +Unknown
6. Nicholas Griffin b. 1476; d. 1509
└ +Unknown
7. Edward Griffin b. 1507; d. 1569
Private User - I've traced down the new tree from Nicholas Griffin (duplicate of Nicholas Griffin, Sr., of East Carlton) down to the user. The cutpoint is William Lamson Griffin, Sr. (added 2016) vs William Lamson Griffin, Sr (added June 28, 2024).
I have messaged the user about the creation of the duplicates. He is relatively new to Geni (March 2022) and only has his father's tree (stick only) loaded.
From my merge center (June 29, 2024):
https://www.geni.com/search/matches?id=6000000004085143589&src=profile&cmp=btn (Alice Hunt vs Alice Hall) This is not my bailiwick so I'm not touching it.
hoi hoi this can do damage:
DUP Tiemuzhen 鐵木真
MP Genghis Khan of the Mongol Empire
and I don't want to go back there >.<
Duplication: -https://www.geni.com/list/descendants/6000000074791637994#5