Please do NOT merge unsourced duplicates into the MEDIEVAL tree

I found in Geni search: Rodrigo Rodríguez de Sanabria

The image file expands to

https://media.geni.com/p14/02/86/05/fb/5344486751f50161/00000001_2__original.jpg?hash=d2050279161fffeeecf152295c7635b6bcad4c201218b61324aa5bd8291c55a0.1768895999

It's lovely, but needs context and study.

When I use medieval English pedigrees (which can contain errors), I try to separate into smaller family groups, to make it clearer who is who, when and where. I can give you examples.

An excellent start, though. Can you add attributions to the image? i use the "Add comment" field so a link is "live."

Patricia Ann Scoggin

Resolved.

From my merge center - Frederick van Heeckeren van Ese vs Frederick van Heeckeren van der Ese

From my merge center, December 20, 2024:
oldest https://www.geni.com/search/matches?id=6000000007606059090&src=profile&cmp=btn (William Wilkinson)
First cutpoint: https://www.geni.com/search/matches?id=6000000006719738249&src=profile&cmp=btn (Rebecca Dent (MP) vs Rebecca Dent)
Nearest to present cutpoint: William Mitchel Sanders (old) vs William Mitchel Sanders (new). The new profile adds a wife and child. The new tree continues to the user and then two additional generations.

Private User - Resolved the John Putnams. There had been a wife Hannah smerge.

From my merge center, Dec. 27th - https://www.geni.com/search/matches?id=6000000002176661683&src=profile&cmp=btn (John of Luxembourg, king of Bohemia)
The other side looks very odd. It's been hanging around since 2010 and the manager has not been active for a decade.

From my merge center Jan. 1, 2025 - https://www.geni.com/search/matches?id=6000000007060178059&src=profile&cmp=btn (Lawrence Washington, 1st of Sulgrave)
The cutpoint is Thomas Washington vs Thomas Washington The new tree adds a son who was not on Geni previously.
The user has been sent my usual message about duplicates.

Emily Kent Marget - dup Washingtons (and more) isolated. The added son was valid.

Erica Howton - Thanks.

I am seeing merges (!!!) high in the tree. Please see Isabel Middlemore for example.

From my merge center Jan. 5 - https://www.geni.com/search/matches?id=6000000087317220930&src=profile&cmp=btn (Lady Margery Cheney, de Pillesdon, vs Lady Margery Cheney, de Pillesdon,)

Not a medieval but hoping one of the Guru's can take a look at this for me.

Wendelin Ulm and Jean Wendelin ULM appear to be the same person

They go back to 1643 France - with these 2 that appear to be the same (with slight variations)
Jean Jacques Ulm and Jean Jacques Joannes Jacobus /ULM

The new tree brings in many new profiles BUT I don't know the region / time period to know if the variations are a problem.

The new tree is a gedcom so I am not sure if it will continue and add pre 1600 profiles once merged.

The new GEDCOM and the old tree stop at the same tops (Jean Jacques Ulm & his wife). The existing tree is a single manager, inactive, from a Texas family, and is quite skimpy, but does match with new tree. I would expect the new manager to resolve the matching profiles in favor of the existing profiles and place any name variations in the AKA field. But there's only a few for her tree. There might be more matches in the French Canadian portion down tree.