
Although the dates are different for these
Michael Higman
Michael Higman
They have the same grandson
Matthew Higman
Matthew Higman
They appear to be duplicated for 7 generations to
Robert Higman
Robert Higman
Update to https://www.geni.com/discussions/158450?msg=1741400: I have heard from the user. They will be deleting the stick (and sometimes spouse) tree above George Whitefield Rathbun
Second attempt at duplicating the same profile (first one already isolated and removed):
Sir Renfred de Arundell
RENFRED DE ARUNDELL
https://www.geni.com/merge/compare/6000000006185220914?to=600000021...
The first one (isolated and removed already):
SIR RENFRED DE ARUNDELL
I’m gonna tell you the same thing I told the others if you didn’t read it on my profile yes, I might be new to Geni but I’m not new to merging profiles. Been doing it for years with family search and other website websites just like with them this website does it too. It asked me to do it. It told me it was needed because it put it as an inconsistency as data conflict if none of these things should be happening with newbies or anyone in general other than you don’t you think that they need to fix that because I put it exactly like it told me to do I didn’t see anything different. It might’ve been off by a year or something and that’s it I didn’t. I don’t go around willy-nilly just virgin profiles for the fun of it. OK so just FYI I’m not playing games or something. I’m not a child. I did what the system told me to do if you all have a problem with that I suggest you take it up with them so they can fix it because I only did what it told me to do. I have no interest in medieval. I don’t even know how I ended up there and trust me. I don’t wanna go back to messing with that stuff. I’m not interested in it. I’m only trying to do my line recent maybe last 200 years is that OK?
Hi Private User
This project overview will explain why we don't want pre 1600 profiles merged https://www.geni.com/projects/Historical-Tree-Clean-Up-Please-Park-Unsourced-DUPLICATES-in-the-Historical-Tree-Here%21/37332
If you are getting directed to here then one of the profiles you manage must be at least 400 years old
It's probably these profiles born back in the 1400's - 2nd Baron Hungerford Robert Hungerford and 4th Baroness Botreaux Margaret Hungerford
They are duplicates of profiles that have been on Geni since 2007 and have thousands of descendants on Geni.
Hi - these merge requests have appeared for me:
https://www.geni.com/merge/compare/6000000006444176913?return=match...
https://www.geni.com/merge/compare/6000000003036891300?return=match...
https://www.geni.com/merge/compare/6000000002426131471?to=600000021...
The duplicate line doesn't add anything to the tree and is of no kinship to its creator, that I can see.
https://www.geni.com/merge/compare/6000000097031120253?to=600000021...
Welf I, count in Swabia
Count Welf Van Altdorf, DUP cut point
https://www.geni.com/merge/compare/6000000002198362511?to=600000021...
Lambert I, count of Louvain
Lambert I, count of Louvain
https://www.geni.com/merge/compare/6000000001462712746?to=600000020...
Lambert's twig could probably be merged easily enough, but there may be some reason why they haven't been yet.
Hi PRO Brian Clinton Brown
if you find
Brian Clinton Brown
if you find other medieval duplications please report them here TNX
UNDER 1000 /!\ (C) PZL UNDO https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=86768285650
..clean check isolate report.. usual procedure T.T
HI, PRO Dale Foresythe A920726
if you find other medieval duplications please report them here TNX
SAME UNDER 1000 tree, UNDO: -https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=86767523760
.. admin already known T.T
OMG the duplication was there half merged from 6 months T.T
https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=86060095840 :Q
LOTS of identical merge requests:
https://www.geni.com/merge/compare/6000000003650750533?return=match...
https://www.geni.com/merge/compare/6000000003650750533?return=match...
https://www.geni.com/merge/compare/6000000003650750533?return=match...
https://www.geni.com/merge/compare/6000000003650750533?return=match...
https://www.geni.com/merge/compare/6000000003650750533?return=match...
This is is against a 1425 profile, Sir John Delves, Kt. None of the recently imported profiles have dates but they clearly refer to the same family.
Private User TNX but now you definitely need help:
cut parents of Count Welf Van Altdorf, DUP cut point (report his big duplication)
Hardrad, DUP single DUP
..working
they are practically 2 duplications of the under 1000 Charlemagne tree 2021+2024
which go down to 1200 new merged disaster to be solved..
now working on Rudolph II de Cocq, Heer van Weerdenburg 1300
I'm sorry but I always find the same ADMN:
Agnes de Cock van Weerdenburg, DUP TREE
DUP tree of
Lady Agnes Hendriks van Cuyk
Help fast! This guy has popped onto the site and is already merging tons of historical profiles plus has added himself as the son of the 7th earl Spencer -which he guaranteed is NOT!
He needs to be stopped asap and all the merges he's done reversed. The profiles seriously need to be locked, all historical and notable people. This is unsustainable and creates just more and more mess on the site. Check his activities: