
Hi curators - here is another medieval profile with an unsourced pending "match:" Sir John Hurst, II
Hi curators - here are more medieval profiles with unsourced pending "matches:"
Lady Mary Heston
Eleanor de Burgh
WTF ora ti ci metti pure tu Tommaso Valarani !?
-https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=86803039420
-https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=86803036670
-https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=86803034390
(C) PLZ UNDO
no..don't UNDO, too many UNDO to do,
I'm going to work on a cutting point..
..but be careful because lately half of the medieval problems have a (C) in front and the other half a (PRO)
__________
summary of the unsolved issues reported on the previous page:
-https://www.geni.com/discussions/158450?msg=1744101
merged in 1200 and dates back to 1000... (dont merge over)
in reality below extends branched from down to 1500
above no, but below you can merge, maybe using the easier (C) tool,
something adds, and anyway the other couple of admins never write anything anywhere them too.
Giacomo Valperga, conte di Masino
is the huge DUP tree of Giacomo Valperga, conte di Masino
plz CUT and report for deletion suffixed DUP parents of Uberto I, conte di Pombia
___________
I'm documenting pulling moving cutting adding renaming dating fixing something hugely branched duplicated that should never ever be merged in the middle of the middle ages.. -_-
or what are we talking about here? T.T
This is probably not so much about duplicates but could a curator check what this parentage of Iñigo Jimenez of Pamplona was before as a Elizabeth Orlando has been all over the place on these old profiles changing the parents and left no reference. I suspect she is following her own tree from some other site because she doesn't add sources or anything it seems. I can't for some reason see anything about what the information was before, because there is no "view"on her revision activity.This has done just last year.
Íñigo Jiménez
Arnulf, Duke of Bavaria
Duke Arnulf I „the Bad“ von Bayern
This one also showing up as a potential match: Arnulf I. `der Böse` von Bayern
https://www.geni.com/merge/compare/6000000214405388837?to=600000000...
https://www.geni.com/search/matches?id=6000000214405388837&src=...
https://www.geni.com/discussions/288135?msg=1744728
Impératrice Isabelle des Aviz, DUD -_- forced deletion
Please, duplicate medieval profile reported by Curator Private User
Match removed
From "ATTENTION....." - https://www.geni.com/discussions/286438?msg=1744821 "Please reverse https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=86812676030."
I will not touch this time period.
Today's merge center match: https://www.geni.com/search/matches?id=6000000004089124718&src=profile&cmp=btn (John Jordaine)
Cutpoint is Rev. Robert Jordan (old) vs Rev. Robert Jordan (new).
NOT a duplicate, but:
Would someone like to curate Margaret Welles, Baroness de Welles (Bardoff)? Asking here instead of the other thread since you're the experts. :)
(And, asking because I occasionally get management requests on it and I have no idea what to do there.)
TNX @ Bo-Arne & @Erica
there are still 3 things left on:
-https://www.geni.com/discussions/158450?msg=1744101
cutting now suffixed DUP MOM of Aleidas de Hainaut
you (C) can easily isolate for quick destruction report the long DUP line of Ida de Lovain, DUP up to Charlemagne ..
& kindly tagging the yesterday PRO merger Brian Clinton Brown we should automatically trill him with a "Please do NOT merge unsourced duplicates into the MEDIEVAL tree"
From my merge center - https://www.geni.com/search/matches?id=6000000042651843238&src=profile&cmp=btn (Willem van Isendoorn) The other side adds a child who is not attached to the "old" tree.
Well out of my expertise.
And another "match" that is incorrect - https://www.geni.com/search/matches?id=6000000003759119649&src=profile&cmp=btn (Robert Waterton, Lord of Waterton in the Isle of Axholme vs Robert Waterton, of Waterton and Methley) Dates are off but the wife is correct.
Hi PRO merger Charlene Rai Bosiak
No sorry here we do not merge the millennial DUP Kings, they create too many conflicts, inconveniences and hours of work for nothing, in short they never bring anything good: and what improvements should someone who in 2025 duplicates medieval kings on Geni bring?:)
now a (C) will perhaps still cancel easily if the merge is only one,
if they still have the strength, the desire, the stimulus..
..I for example am wavering .. but maybe you next time could report them here:)
--> https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=86828454770
dear (C) I advise you to hurry up because it's another DUP kings bomb down to
King Philip III "The Hardy" Filips van Frankrijk, III DUP T.T
new father of Daniel Van den Veene ( cut point after UNDO)
everything is already there, no you absolutely do not have to clone and duplicate anything else.
about Daniel Van den Veene
*Why should he ever be an unknown random son of Philip III, "the Bold" king of France !?
*Why should Marguerite d'Artois should be his wife!? (Queen dies at 25 with as many as 5 legitimate children!-_-)
chatGPT told you!?