Ermengarde of Anjou, Duchess Of Brittany - 2 sisters same person

Started by Livio Scremin on Monday, June 3, 2019
Problem with this page?

Participants:

Profiles Mentioned:

Related Projects:

Showing 31-49 of 49 posts

Haha!

Unmerged: ERMENGARDE OF ANJOU , Mother de Vermandois , Ermengarde de Vermandois to see if mismerged lines is the root of the problem you are seeing.

Ermangarde d'Anjou, Duchess of Bretagne (< 965 - >982)
do Geoffroy d'Anjou & Adela de Meaux
x 973 Conan De Rennes
*Geoffroy ([980]-20 Nov 1008)
*Judith ([982]-16 Jun 1017)
*Judicaël (-1037)
*Catuallon (-15 Jan, 1050 Or >)
*Hurnod [Urvod] (- >1026)

This merge https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=73983105910 Merged 9 June 2019 at 5:48 PM by Livio Scremin made Heribert IV (VI), comte de Vermandois her son - AGAINST the Curator note on his profile by Pam Wilson clearly saying he was the son of Eudes/Otto of Vermandois and Pavia (or Patia)
Undoing the merge.

Removing erroneous parents from Herbert VI de Vermandois.

The problem of the two Ermengardes that you complain about here: https://www.geni.com/discussions/197197?msg=1300867 was created by your merge here: https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=73932550390 - Merged 5 June 2019 at 3:43 AM by Livio Scremin.

Undoing merge.
Cutting relationships on Milo de Vermandois, Count so it can't happen again.

Removng conflict created on mothers of Rainard de Tonnerre, Comte de Tonnerre

And unmerging the duplicate GEOFFREY GREY GOWN gives Ermengarde her parents back.

Locking Ermengarde's relationships to prevent the above mess happening again, despite Curator notes and even though merged profiles obviously conflicted.

incredible Sharon Doubell ability to misunderstand me, or you probably haven't even read the evolution of page 1: there were only 2 parents to assign (and then the continuation of work)
..Since Erica Howton had answered the call I had started with her working method:
first look for the origin of the clones (and I had found them), then merge them, assigning the parents, the cut is made without leaving scraps to spam the searches..

you cancel, cut, treat just only what you need:
you canceled these mergers, but they were right:
-MP Heribert IV (VI), comte de Vermandois
- CLONE Herbert VI de Vermandois
-----
-MP Milon IV de Tonnerre
-CLONE Milo de Vermandois, Count
...it was enough to assign the right parents, affecting the spit as required..
now do you merge them (again) or do you leave them to spam the search?
but above all look at what conflicts you have left in this nodes:

- https://www.geni.com/family-tree/index/6000000000172833094
*GENI JPG https://www.geni.com/photo/view/6000000036850731188?photo_id=600000...
*JPG PUBLIC https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Nl7UKPL3AiWdhsJXtcD6auKvSvfTlzov/v...
-----
- https://www.geni.com/family-tree/index/6000000002774361183#60000000...
*GENI JPG https://www.geni.com/photo/view/6000000036850731188?album_type=&amp...=
*JPG PUBLIC https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gWwsCcaUS38YfWzTzsQfEeeBvR882__e/v...
----
Mike Stangel

We do not merge duplicates 'clones' into the Medieval Tree because of the conflicts they create in the tree that comes with them. You have been told this numbers of times, by numbers of Curators. Unmerging is the only way, that doesn't take 4 days, to find these conflicts when YOU complain about them.
You merge profiles - and 15 minutes later complain about the conflicts you yourself brought in - insulting and blaming everyone else for the fact that they're there. [See above]

the problems had been there since 2015,
I called the curators, Erica was the first to notice. (read her 2nd message)
stop insulting me

Telling you that you're creating Tree Conflicts and then blaming other people (sometimes minutes later) for them isn't insulting you.

this is a grim lie, and insults my intelligence.
Before continuing updated with your talented and highly esteemed colleague (the first to see the situation and who knows my well accuracy) STOP

This merge https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=73983105910 Merged 9 June 2019 at 5:48 PM by Livio Scremin made Heribert IV (VI), comte de Vermandois her son - AGAINST the Curator note on his profile by Pam Wilson clearly saying he was the son of Eudes/Otto of Vermandois and Pavia (or Patia)

The problem of the two Ermengardes that you complain about here: https://www.geni.com/discussions/197197?msg=1300867 was created by your merge here: https://www.geni.com/merge/view?revision_id=73932550390 - Merged 5 June 2019 at 3:43 AM by Livio Scremin.

Did Marguerite of Anjoy have a daughter named Marguerite De Valois? Was she Charles 2nd wife or 1 wife? There is two Marguerites? Marguerite De Broussard (Valois) mother Helen De Broussard and Marguerite De Valois mother is Marguerite De Anjou of De Maine. I think there is conflicts going on. I think we need to find proof on this Helen De Broussard (Brousard) Brochard. They say Marguerite was his first daughter. Who is her mother? Helen was probably just a mistress. There is a conflict between the two Marguerites.

Private User I don't know, maybe you should try to link at least some of the profiles you are referring to..
..maybe PLZ in a new discussion, because I think the end of this discussion deserves to be left like this:

- I infamous for the actions of June 9th
- without realizing that I me myself started the discussion on June 4th
- and that immediately since June 5th for the whole "page1" we have fixed it far and wide with (C) together.. (a simple split required was not performed:)

[in any case apart from the bulk duplicates left to wander, and the blocked profiles that could be improved in names, descriptions and links .. in any case the DISCUSSION is genealogically now SOLVED]

Livio I'm sorry, I'm talking about somebody different. Charles count of Valois's daughter. Marguerite De Broussard(Valois). I got here through her son DeBlos. Yes, I need to go under Charles De Valois page.

Ermengarde of Anjou, is my 27th great Grandmother, so I got here looking at different pages and trees.

Showing 31-49 of 49 posts

Create a free account or login to participate in this discussion