What do we know ?
What do we know about Armenian kingdom ?
1) Ashot II did not have a son whom to ecpected to follow as a king.
2) Histories are written usually on this aspect that who is the king and who are his sons, cause It is always a male that continues the kingdom in ancient times. Same has been in Europe too. If king did have daughters but not a son, the kingdom moved to a closest male on the bloodline.
What do we know about Ashot II ?
1) Ashot II was a direct descendent of the eastern Roman empire.
2) He was Christian and he visited Byzantium.
3) He lived the exactly the same time as Ripsimia.
What do we know about Ripsimia ?
1) She is saed to be Armenian also a Rhipsime of Bagratuni.
2) She is saed to be mother of a Tsar Samuil.
3) She lived exactly the same time as Ashot II.
4) Answer to this paradigm. Why would any women especially be mentioned as Armenian when concerning a Tsar's mother If she was not an important person ?
We may think that Armenian history never wrote about Ripsimia the Armenian because she no longer was part of the Kingdom Bagratuni. The name though is like Rhipsime, Smbat I's mother. We can only find Ripsime in Bulgarian texts, since she is part of the continuous kingdom. If Bulgarian text clearly says the origin of Tsar Samuil's mother we can be sure that she is the princess of Armenian King. No else would been married and been written about, also there is the connection of Byzantium Empire where Ashot II visited and the Christendom.