Mimi Snyder
yesterday at 12:00 AM
Managers of Hildegard of Vinzgouw,I would like to add "Empress Hildegard von Vinzgau of the Holy Roman Empire" to her name....
Ben M. Angel
yesterday at 12:31 AM
Empress is a title, and the Holy Roman Empire was not in existence during her lifetime. For guidance on the evolution of the Frankish Empire into the Germanic state later known as the Holy Roman Empire, please refer to its Wikipedia page. -Ben.
Steve Montgomery
yesterday at 1:40 AM
I personaly would not change this profile Unless a majority of the managers of this profile are in agreement to any changes that are proven as fact.....
Bjørn P. Brox
yesterday at 9:06 AM
Empress is definitely not a part of anyone's name.
You can however us it in the Display Name field, but remember that very long display names just messes up the node in tree view.
In my opinion Empress and other things that tells more about the person should be used in the About Me.
Bjørn P. Brox
yesterday at 9:08 AM
Secondly: Since she is French Empress would be wrong anyhow.
Ann Vermeulen (Ramsey)
yesterday at 11:50 AM
She wasn't English. There shouldn't be any English at all in her name.
Tammy Swingle (Tucker), Volunteer Curator
yesterday at 7:26 PM
I agree with Ann and Bjorn.
Erica Isabel Howton, (c)
yesterday at 7:41 PM
Mimi
Can I ask why you were interested in adding to the name?
I try and check the validity of a profile name by using google to find out more details about a person, or source information, etc.
The name Hildegard of Vinzgouw gives me unambiguous results. I worry that altering it would lead me astray.
DLD
yesterday at 8:33 PM
Actually since she was Germanic, her correct name should be
Hildegard av Vinzgouw. Since we do not know if she was actually crowned "Empress of the West" and "Queen of the Franks", we can only give her the title Consort which just translates to wife in French.
If she was crowned, then the titles should be in French..Impératrice de l'Ouest et Reine des Francs. However, I doubt that she was crowned and did not hold the titles in her own right so I vote to put her name in its Germanic form and no titles. We can put in the "about her" section that she was the Queen Consort.
Mimi Snyder
yesterday at 8:35 PM
She was the second wife of Charlemagne.
Stanford references her as an Empress here:
http://www.stanford.edu/group/auden/cgi-bin/auden/individual.php?pi...
Here are other references:
http://www.american-pictures.com/genealogy/persons/per01369.htm
I understand some resist the English Name Empress... but Charlemagne (as he is well known today) was Carolus Magnus, Imperator.
How about Imperatrix?
Erica Isabel Howton, (c)
yesterday at 9:44 PM
Hi Mimi
I love the Auden's Ghosts site myself! But it's not an "official" site from Stanford's medieval history dept or anything like that: the webmaster is http://www.stanford.edu/~njenkins/ an Auden (20th century poetry) expert.- DLD's point is "we do not know if Hildegard had any "crowned" title at all so we cannot add that. We could add "consort" but that's fairly meaningless / unneeded for disambiguation in the name.
- Ben's point is that the Holy Roman Empire didn't exist then, so how could she be an "Empress" of something that didn't happen yet?
- I tested the suggested name of Hildegard av Vinzgouw and it gave great results: pages in many languages including English. For someone of common heritage this is, to me, the most important issue of all.
DLD
yesterday at 9:52 PM
Mini,
I am sorry but those two sites are not actually references.
The gentlemen who posted the genealogical information from Stanford is a Prof of English, working on the social roots of W. H. Auden. His information should not be taken as "proof" of any historical fact, other that Charlemagne was married to a lady called Hildegard. In fact, he has her listed as Empress of the Romans, which we know was not the case. Carolus was crowned Holy Roman Emperor after the death of Hildegard. This is obviously not a reference site; he doesn't even have references.
The second website is even less of a reference,just another of the countless unsourced and unreferenced genealogical trees on the web.
A Historian,preferably from France, who is specializes in the history of this era should be able to tell us if she held the titles in her own right (i.e. she was crowned Reine des Francs & Impératrice de l'Ouest) or only by marriage.
I doubt she was crowned. She was his consort;that's it.
DLD
yesterday at 10:34 PM
The Empress of the West title could be wrong. Have to check that more carefully. He was King of the Franks & Lombards.
As for the name... we should stick to the same language.
Mini, Carolus Magnus is Latin for Charles The Great (I knew all those years taking Latin with the nuns would pay off one day). So, if we use Latin for his name.. we should use Latin for his wives as well.
He was actually Charles I, known as Charles Le Grand if we use French.
Interesting point but Charles did not speak French. French, as a language, did not exist at the time. He would have spoke a form of German (not German but a language that developed into German) and, of course, Latin.