i'm not a lifer but then the thread title isn't specific to lifetime memberships, so i'd like to raise a question that might impact on all Geni users.
My concern is that, for all the hand wringing regarding default on the lifetime agreements and the relative merits of the 5 year offer, what is the likelihood that Geni and/or MH will exist in 5 years time? What is the likelihood that the two sites will still be distinctly seperate entities in 5 years time?
Geni may cease to exist in a recognisable form before any class action reaches a verdict.
Because i like metaphors:
If the owners of Ferrari bought Rolls Royce there would not be much chance of a merger as the customer focus of the two brand is quite dissimilar. Conversely, if Ford bought out Toyota the focus of the two companies would be so similiar as to make it quite reasonable that they could rebrand as Forota so as not to split their target market.
Back to our situation:
If the intention truly is to keep Geni and MH seperate the ownership of the two brands is of no real importance to the end users - Pepsi doesn't email all it's customers every time there is a change in their share holder structure, because it doesn't have any real impact on the customers.
If the commercial entity that owns MH purchases Geni there is no reason why MH's privacy standards need to be enforced on Geni, nor should MH's membership protocols impact on Geni, they are two seperate commercial entities that just happen to be owner by the same person.
Another car metaphor, if one car i own needs fuel or tyres i don't have to refuel the other cars i own.
IMHO (In My Humble Opinion) the encroachment of MH rules/requirements onto Geni is a fore runner of a merge of the two sites, whether that is thru a merger and rebranding or simply one site swallowing the other whole i don't know.
I am not even sure that a merger would be a bad thing, i simply feel that one is coming and when it does having a lifetime membership with a website that no longer exists won't do anyone much good.
?