Hmmm, smart matches? Can't be smarter than the input.
I have tested some of the matches and really found some new data here
and there, a new child or the date of burial. And it is good to get the MH source into the profile. The tree is not changed.
To get more information about the trees behind the MH-profiles seems to require another monthly fee.
On the other hand I have more than 80 blue dots, some with even more than 40 MH-matches and a lot of them seem to be totally irrelevant and redundant information.
I would like to have the capability to turn the blue dots off ! Please make this the next project. Smart matching is - to say frankly - totally overestimated and cannot replace research, libraries and local church books.
I have my special test sample, the imaginary Borcholdts, a profile with 41 matches which are more or less identical; submittet from different people and copied from some diffuse third hand information.
The information given from the MH submitters is not proven at all, and according to local researchers it is simply wrong. The links below show the 41 smart matches and also the local source ...you need to be able to read Swedish, however.
http://www.myheritage.se/FP/record-matches.php?action=showAdHocReco...
http://www.myheritage.se/FP/record-matches.php?action=showAdHocReco...
Do you have means to reduce identical MH-profiles ?
And the very best sample to the "blue-dot-confusion" is the "Stenbrikke/Eberstein case" which was created to prove ones relationship to the pharaos, to Odin, the mongols and Cleopatra.
So far I have not really found any profound "blue-dot-information", maybe some others have ? By the way, I had a lifetime subscription which now was replaced by the revolutionary "blue-dot". Maybe somebody else is impressed and can explain the advantages.
Finally it's all about our money and MH's business.