Hi All,
Extensive research and work done by Mr. Mansell Upham on early Cape records, which has been published in Capensis (Cape genealogical Society journal) shows that they are 2 different individuals.
Citations:
1. Mansell Upham, "In Hevigen Woede . . . Earliest recorded female bandiet at the Cape of Good Hope - A Study in Upward Mobility", Capensis (In Hevigen Woede) 3/97, 4/97, Western Cape Branch, Genealogical Society of South Africa, (1997): Hans Christoffel Snijman (also found as Hans Christoffel Snijder or Schneider) hailed from Heidelberg in the Palatinate and is first mentioned in the records as a soldier under the Chamber of Rotterdam in 1665 together with Arnoldus Willemsz. Date estimated by compiler. Hereinafter cited as "In Hevigen Woede . . ."
2. Mansell Upham, "In Hevigen Woede . . .", Regular nocturnal activity on the part of a distracted sentry inside the living quarters of the Fort's washerwoman - the Company slave familiarly known to all as Groote Catrijn - resulted in the conviction on 30 July 1667 of Hans Christoffel Snijman
3. Mansell Upham, "In Hevigen Woede . . .", Groote Catrijn's illegitimate son was baptised Christoffel on 9 March 1669 and witnessed by Mooij Ansela The child's paternity was no secret. He was named directly after the father. Throughout his life he identified himself by his father's surname, as did his own children.
Basically Hans Christoffel Schneider was a soldier in the employ of the VOC and was a sentry on Robben Island. He slept with one of the inmates, Groote Catrijn and made her pregnant. He was charged with damaging company property and deported back to Europe.
Groote Catrijn then later married Anthonij Janz van Bengale. The child was looked after by this couple and baptized with his father's name, derived from Schneider, NOT van Bengale, who was his stepfather.
Regards
Gary Westermann