I do not believe this is the same Thomas Kilburn and Elizabeth barker. Elizabeth married George in Massachusetts in Rowley.
http://www.stupakgen.net/Genealogy/Spencer/01408_kilb.htm
Can we clarify this, please?
I do not believe this is the same Thomas Kilburn and Elizabeth barker. Elizabeth married George in Massachusetts in Rowley.
http://www.stupakgen.net/Genealogy/Spencer/01408_kilb.htm
Can we clarify this, please?
I disconnected Elizabeth Kilbourne as wife of Thomas Kilbourne, Jr.
According to http://www.stupakgen.net/Genealogy/Spencer/02816_kilb.htm
2817. Elizabeth Barker {a,b,wa}. Elizabeth (also seen as Elizabeth Baker) was born probably around 1615 in England, and died in 1698 in Rowley. She is a daughter of ___ Barker.
She married
George Kilbourne {a,b,c,wa} was born Feb 1611/12 in Wood Ditton (Cambridge) England, and died 14 Oct 1685 in Rowley (Essex) Massachusetts. He is supposedly a son of Thomas Kilbourne [5632] and Frances Moody.
NOTE: The link to [5632] Thomas is questionable; Jacobus {c} says George is not included in Thomas’ will, and therefore questions whether he was a son of Thomas. It is possible that our Kilbourne line stops here with George.. George married in Rowley,
George and Elizabeth had six children ....