South African mtDNA - Female Progenitors lists Engeltje Cornelisz van der Bout as U5a1a.
This is substantiated by Piet Retief Venter in his post (https://www.geni.com/discussions/135293?msg=939666) where he states:
I'm glad you guys find this interesting! My mtDNA haplogroup (and the haplo of Thea de Wet) is U5a1a. We 'inherited' this, via our different maternal lineages, from Engeltje vd Bout. We also did 'paper trail genealogy', back to Engeltje.
Then in another discussion thread (https://www.geni.com/discussions/141585?msg=973518) Piet Retief Venter states:
My 'tuppence worth', as a layman: I am matrilineally descended from Engeltje vd Bout. My mtDNA haplo is U5a1c1, and, barring mutations, this would also have been Engeltje's haplotype.
i.e. in one thread he states it's U5a1a and in another thread he states it's u5a1c1. The landing page of this project states it is U5a1a.
My wife is also a descendant of Anna Maria Jacoba Pelser, b2c3 *1745.
Piet Retief Venter's line comes from her daughter Martha Maria Griesel, b9 *1776, while my wife's line comes from her other daughter Anna Dorothea Griesel, b2 *1764.
My wife's full sequence mtDNA haplogroup is U5a1c1. Can we reach a consensus on this matter and update the project to reflect?
That was my first thought, Private User. Typos happen too, tho.
Piet Retief Venter and Christelle Horne Viljoen - help!
Private User - that's fantastic news! And thankyou for sharing - I'll start the updating and Discussions now.
This time of DNA testing corroborating Genealogy is sooooo exciting!
I sent an email to Dr. Thea de Wet, asking for more information. Haven't heard back yet. Might anyone have access to FAMILIA 48 (4) 2011 pp. 171-176 for reference?
Sharon Doubell - grandmother named Johannes Christoffel "Stoffelina" Swanepoel, e3f8?
Sharon Doubell on a different note. MyHeritage has the option of loading your DNA and then it compare it to other MyHeritage users who uploaded their DNA, but that is only Autosomal/Family Finder.
But I am not to happy about their Terms and conditions.
Hi Corrie Drummond and Sharon Doubell - I refer to the differences in the mtDNA haplo, which can be traced back to Engeltje vd Bout. I was relying on memory when I wrote U5a1a, but when I checked later on I discovered that a researcher at the University of Pretoria had classified my haplotype as U5a1c1. So, officially my mtDNA haplo (and the haplotype of Engeltje, by 'triangulation') is U5a1c1. I apologize for my inaccuracy when I mentioned U5a1a, to start with :-)
OKay, I've updated - and also added a note on: Anna Maria Jacoba Pelser, SM
Yes, the FTDNA group is a good one - I use a lot here.
OK - I am also related about 3-4 generations apart but according to all 32 atDNA matches it results in about 6-9 "Geni lines" apart. Having read this discussion, I think you missed the important point made by Private User that the grandmother has a 'male' name. Upon further scrutiny I do not have faith in that line, in the sense that the DVN number is not consistent with SAF v14 p 443 and if it actually is, the parents of Johannes Christoffel is not correct. Either way, I believe the line is incorrect. U5 is a much more common designation than most, so it could easily have been another female prog. I urge you to look at the line more closely.
My grandmother was named Johannes Christoffel Hattingh. Her twin, also female (to my knowledge and according to family communication), was named Johannes Michiel. My aunt was also named Johannes Christoffel Swanepoel. This information is correct, according to all documentation I have gathered, including my grandfather's Bible.
Geni is still tweaking the atDNA match descriptions, Jan, but you need to give us the specific profiles you are referencing as matching so we can follow what you're saying. Do you mean your relationship to Engeltje Cornelisz van der Bout or Christelle?
DVN are often wrong and increasingly out of date, and as this is an mtDNA question, I don't think the DVN - a paternal reference system - is pertinent?
You also seem to have been referring to a merge conflict problem, rather than an issue with Christelle's actual line; and you seem to me to have resolved it. Is that the case, and are you happy with Christelle's line to Engeltjie now?
Another U5 corroboration of Engeltje Cornelisz van der Bout, SM/PROG 's MtDNA from
Private Gerhardus Cornelius Hendrik Viljoen
→ Anna Magrietha Swanepoel Viljoen
his mother → David Christiaan Dirk Swanepoel, b7c2d1e6f4g2
her father → Johannes Hermanus Swanepoel, b7c2d1e6f4
his father → Stephanus Johannes Marthinus Swanepoel, b7c2d1e6
his father → Helena Magdalena Pelser Swanepoel, b2c5d3
his mother → Petrus Cornelius Pelser Peltzer, b2c5
her father → Engela Catharina Zaaijman Pelser, a1b1c5
his mother → Anna Maria Koopman
her mother → Engeltje Cornelisz van der Bout, SM/PROG
her mother
Engeltjie
Catherina Koopman
Maria du Plooy
Maria Johanna Hattingh (Botha)
Maria Johanna Aletta Pretorius, b11c2d1e1
Maria Johanna Aletta Catharina Hattingh, b3c7d1e6f9g5
Johannes Christoffel "Stoffelina" Swanepoel, e3f8 (female)
Anna Swanepoel
It goes through a different daughter of Engeltjie's:
Catharina Koopman, SM
than everybody else's:
Anna Maria Koopman
I wonder if just U5 is enough to use as triangulation?
The "he" that you refer to is my brother, so his mitochondrial line and mine are identical. If you review the Cape Dutch DNA Stamouer Project, you will see the mt progenitor groupings based on HVR1 and HVR2 mutations. I am grouped under Engeltje U5a1c1 although my HVR2 mutations are not listed (because I tested before HVR2 was added). A number of my matches have tested further to U5a1c1a.
Hi Christelle, Sharon,
My wife and Piet Retief Venter are descendants of Engeltjie though daughter Anna Maria Koopman whereas Christelle and brother are descendants of Engeltjie through Catharina Koopman.
That still leaves three sisters to research/test:
Francina Koopman
Matthyn Koopman
Johanna Carelse van den Burgh
My wife has 28 HVR1 (U5) matches on FTDNA quite a few of whom have clear South African links (van Huyssteen, van Zyl etc) incl. Dr. Thea de Wet mentioned above.
I agree that we can confirm Engeltjie as U5 and define later once further HVR1, HVR2 and CR matches are found i.e. Confirmed Haplogroup U5, Predicted Haplogroup U5a1c1 or something to that effect?