There's some inaccurate information here that needs to be removed:
1. He did not have a child named Louis Charles Antoinette and there was no son named Joseph François Choiseul.
2. His daughter Marie Therese was never married to someone named van der Woodsten and had no children.
3. The DNA result is probably inaccurate since it comes from the Choiseul line.
The DNA came from a man who traveled incognito as Choiseul, among other names ......his traveling companion was Gabriel Choiseul. Once in Canada they used the name Choisse or something similar and finally settled with the name Joseph Francois Martel. His wife married twice so all the kids became Gendereau and then there were Gendreau children by the second marriage. Parents names are omis on most certificates and other means are needed to determine who the parents were.
None of the children of Louis XVI survived into adulthood except for his daughter. The dauphin (Louis Charles), died in 1795 and his brother died in 1789 . This has been confirmed by DNA testing so Choiseul's descent from Louis XVI is impossible. Unless you have a good source for this, I really think he should be disconnected.
The DNA came from a man who traveled incognito as Choiseul, among other names ......his traveling companion was Gabriel Choiseul. Once in Canada they used the name Choisse or something similar and finally settled with the name Joseph Francois Martel. His wife married twice so all the kids became Gendereau and then there were Gendreau children by the second marriage. Parents names are omis on most certificates and other means are needed to determine who the parents were.
I inherited curating this profile from another curator who was overloaded. I've read the discussion and will make these corrections.
https://www.geni.com/people/Jön-Axel-Choiseul-dit-Martel/6000000012... I suggest that you start a discussion and set forth the evidence and let people weigh in. But without irrefutable evidence -- documentary and DNA -- Geni should stick to what is known and proven.