I have a valid reason for my Concern with the WALDROP LINEAGE posted here on GENI as it appears, based on many years of digging, that my GG GF, Martin Thompson, married Katherine Waldrop, daughter of Edmund Waldrop, Rutherford County, NC in 1823. Contact me at pthompson38@bellsouth.net if you would like to know more. So right off, there is my interest in the Waldrop Lineage and the accuracy of what is posted here on GENI.
That said:
Because I have been researching the potential Waldrop Connection for several years now, I have gained acquaintances with several Waldrop researchers. One Couple in particular is: HOWARD & CAROL ANNE WALDROP who originated the 1st and only "Waldrop" Project which then grew and added a DNA project as well.
This Project and the people within it, is some of the "BEST" Waldrop researchers with information available. It is documented in most cases and any theory is collaborated with the best researchers within the project.
A family rumor for my line of THOMPSON is that Martin Thompson married Catherine Knox Polk in about 1820. I have done a ton of work trying to prove or disprove that family statement and have only recently succumbed to the Martin Thompson marriage to Katherine Waldrop.
Yesterday it was pointed out to me that "I" have a connection path to LT. COL. WILLIAM POLK, and I thought, oh no!!! Here we go again!!!!!! Then, it was pointed out to me that my Connection Path was through, KATHERINE WALDROP, daughter of EDMUND. I was more than ecstatic that I had the opportunity to not only prove my family rumored tale but that all my years of work and accumulation of documentation was absolute GOLD! So I Printed Profiles all the way into the 1600's until my Common Ancestor turned and headed back to my Connection Path with LT. COL. WILLIAM POLK. I then sent those pages to Howard and Carol Anne Waldrop for review to see if they would agree and/or recognized any of this.
I'm afraid there are quite a few loose ends to this Lineage and I'm very disappointed to find that apparently some of the work done has just been copied work, not verified, not documented and therefore, not valid.
I'm coming to EVERYONE WITH INTEREST IN THE WALDROP LINEAGE, to please step forward and help correct this matter and "COLLABORATE" as you are supposed to be doing here so that we may get this record straight, AND/OR, provide the information necessary to correct Howard Waldrop but you will need documented proof as heresy and copied work will not work.
This email is long but I must include the comments made by the originator of the WALDROP PROJECT at Rootsweb so that you understand "where" the errors are being pointed out. I'm also including the ENTIRE WALDROP DATABASE from Rootsweb: (Roots has this database up again, at least for the moment). There will also be LINKS within his statements below. I'm sorry folks but I have to stand by Howard as I know that he has been tracing the WALDROP LINE for almost 40 years. I also have been all over the WALDROP PROJECT and know how anal they are about their data.
I would love nothing more than for someone to step forward and prove me wrong but I do believe there are errors all in this WALDROP LINEAGE here on GENI and I cannot afford that in my Research. If that is the case, then there is no reason for me to be a member here, I can get this easily at Ancestry. Please step forward and discuss this....
Patrick Thompson
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First, the WALDROP DATABASE OF ALL DOCUMENTED WALDROPS:
http://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?db=hwrdwl
The profile of "Luke Jr" is conventional wisdom".
The Family group sheet basically came from George Oscar Russell - we have a paper copy of that FGS.
People just copied it.
Luke was NEVER in Hanover. At no time. That Luke was the son of Joseph d 1775 Amelia.
Luke Sr was in Granville into the 1770s. He bought land in 1772 Laurens Co SC.
Luke had six known children.
As for Michael the immigrant:
It appears that he was in VA by 1672. Claiborne cashed in a headright on Michael in 1682.
There is no proof of wife and children. One can theorize the names of children. But, that list is hypothetical.
A Michael Waldrop has sporadic entries in records from about 1672 to about 1715.
Then, a Michael, married to Sarah, appears in Caroline Co VA about 1744.
Those Williams are pure speculation.
I have no reason to join Geni.
We have over 8700 Waldrops in the data base - the great majority are documented.
I would have to do an awful lot of explaining.
I am at wikitree too.
And, I belong to two genealogical societies.
I do, of course, answer emails. And, answer questions and give out information.
And, people can go to the data base and information (copy and paste all they want). provided Ancestry does not "fix” Rootsweb again.
Howard
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=hwrd...
Hi
Above is the link to Edmond. Please refer to it.
Edmond witnessed a deed; the chain of title shows Luke Waldrop and William Williamson.
Which Luke?
Next, James Waldrop to James Moss. Witnesses James Searcy and Edmond.
This is the item that links James Searcy and Edmond.
!804, he is in Rutherford.
In Rutherford, according to extant records, to help his purported brother, Asa.
https://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=hwrd...
Is Asa actually his brother?
He gave all his children $1; except for Asberry.
Luke yr. Purported father of Edmond.
https://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=hwrd...
This is Luke Jr, son of Luke Sr
Edmond and James Searcy are not named in the will.
He is given credit for the colonial grant on the Enoree River (present day Laurens)
That is where Michael Sr and Michael Jr were.
1773 -
Take note of the name "William Williamson"; and "Joseph Waldrop".
That is the best indication that the Luke who got the grant is a son of Luke sr.
1776 to 1786
There is a gap in the timeline/biography.
So, is Edmond a grandson of Luke Sr?
I think that the issue is in doubt.
I think that we have good reasons to think that Michael Sr and Luke Sr are brothers.
You can see them showing as brothers below.
You may be able to discern why we think so.
Howard
https://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=hwrd...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are not very many people doing genealogy; and, not very many on a surname.
All my lines, except Waldrop are "back to the Ocean". I have noticed that only a few are doing a surname.
Of those few doing a surname, fewer still are experts. I have encountered surnames in which there was only one or two.
Waldrop is the same.
There are a lot of "legends" in Waldrop genealogy; a fair number of these legends do not have a name attached to it. People propagate the legend; but, they do not know the source.
A lot of people - always has been - just copy.
What matters to me is that they copy what is correct. Frequently, they do not.
We try to provide the material, so that people know the source for our conclusions. And, double check.
I am the last of the "Old Guard". I started in 1980; just about everyone else has died or retired.
So., I really do not know anyone, except Carol Ann (who is the partner of my labors). Carol Ann and I are the "old Guard".
My email address book is full of people who used to do genealogy.
In regard to your line, Edmond may, or may not, be a son of “Luke Jr". The issue is in doubt.
If he is, his grandfather is Luke Sr; and his uncle is Jechonias.
One of the reports that I sent you (Edmond James Searcy) have what references in SC there on Edmond. And, his connections to "luke":
1800 --- LAURENS CO., SC. Deed Book G, Page 260, 6 May 1800. Recorded 4 Aug 1801 - George Rose & wife Tamar to HARMON WALDROP for $260.00, 100 acres on Southside of Enoree River, part of a grant to LUKE WALDROP & William Williamson, bounded by Seth Petty Poole, Clayborn Simms (formerly) sold to William Williamson, Henry Meredith, William Taylor. Witness EDMOND WALDROP. [See 10101 Harmon Waldrop for complete text.-CW]
1801 --- LAURENS CO., SC. Deed Book H, page 215. 28 Sep 1801. Recorded 7 Apr 1807 - JAMES WALDROP and wife Elizabeth to James Moss for $550, 150 acres borders on Cheek, James Brown, Spencer Brown, said JAMES WALDROP. Witnesses - Augustin Bumpass, JAMES CERSY [Searcy?] WALDROP, EDMOND WALDROP. Starlin Tucker, J.P. [See 24445 James Waldrop for complete text.-CW
Edmond married in Rutherford in 1804:
1804 --- RUTHERFORD CO., NC. No. 169 Rutherford Co., NC Land Entries January 1804 - April 1826. 27 Dec 1804. EDMOND WALDROP enters 100 acres in Rutherford Co; borders his own line, between "that" and "the" wagon road & runs on "the" vacant land "round his line"; fees due paid; issued.-Clayton HHW
Edmond, basically disinherited most of his children:
1. Will - Edmond Waldrop, Rutherford County, NC, Wills and Miscellaneous Records, 1783-1868 by Wooley, Rutherford Co., NC Will Book E, Page 162, 10 Jul 1846. Recorded Aug Court 1846. "1841 ---- Rutherford Co., NC. Will dated 10 Jul 1841. Recorded August Court 1844. Will Book E, page 162-163.
Actual Text
August Court 1841,
State of Carolina
I EDMUND [Edward? the handwriting is unreadable] Waldrope Sen. of the County of Rutherford and state aforesaid anticipating the certainty of death and the uncertainty of the time when that dispensation of providence may happen being desirous to execute my will with proper discretion and where in Possession of my usual mental faculties do make and declare this to be my last will and testament as follows:
In the first place it is my will and desire that my present wife Mary Ann Waldrope shall remain here at my mansion house wherein I now live under the care and charge of my son Asberry so long as she lives single or dies & is to have a reasonable maintenance by and through her own means and exertion together with the aid and assistance of said Asberry Waldrope and that I, Edmund Waldrope do allow my wife Ann to have the entire use and control of the following pieces of property to wit: a certain note of hand due from Jechonius Waldrop to said Ann of one hundred seventy dollars and the interest two cows and calves two feather beds and furniture and the cuvard and such of the cuvard ware as can be best justified all of which I wish to remain hers for safe keeping at her oversite & pleasure. In the second place it is my will to bequeath to my son Asberry Waldrop the plantation and mansion house whereon I now reside containing 129 acres of land more or less. Beginning on a red oak on the north Bank of Green River and running a North Course 50 East 20 poles keeping with the Buts and Bounds according to the conveyance made from Richard LEWIS to me on the dividing line between myself and Aaron FOWLER, and then with said line to the River & from thence meandering with the River & to the beginning to have and to hold during his natural life also is to have all my horse, cattle, hogs, household and kitchen furniture & _____ Farming tools of every kind also all my Outstanding debts of every kind & it is further my will & desire that if my son Asberry should die before he should marry, that all the property and land bequeathed by me to him be equally divided amongst the surviving heirs and Children of my body. In the 3rd place I will & bequeath to my several children namely as follows: Catherine Thompson, Alford Waldrop, Davidson Waldrop, Jonathan Waldrop, Sarah Splawn Caswell Waldrop, Priscilla Owens, Levina Woods, Edmund P. Waldrop and Jane Waldrop, each to have out of my Estate one dollar apiece to be paid after my death by the Executor.
It is my desire that my wife Ann Waldrop & son Asberry Waldrope act as executor and Executrix to this my last will and testament disqualifying all others. Given under my hand and seal this 10th day of July, Anno Domoni 1841. Signed Edmund Edmund Waldrop
Witness
James Morris [jurat]
Aaron (his mark) Fowler." Listed as Edmond in the database, his will is recorded as Edward. His son, and namesake is also recorded as Edward in the will.
I see two reasons to think that Edmond is a son of Luke jr:
He moved to Rutherford, where Jechonias was living.
His second wife was a daughter of Jechonias.
Howard
We think that “Michael Sr" ( AKA Michael III) and "Luke Sr" are brothers.
We think that because of Joseph (your Joseph) and John (grandson of Michael Sr) both went to Christian Co KY.
Luke Sr had a son named Michael.
A good deal more doubtful:
Luke is credited with getting the colonial grant (given to a Luke Waldrop) on the Enoree River. That grant is adjacent to the grant to James, son of Michael Sr and father of the John who went to Christain Co KY
That can be played either way.
If the Luke Waldrop who got the grant is the son of "Luke Sr" - that is a plus.in thinking Luke Sr and Michael Sr are brothers.
If the Luke Waldrop who got the grant is the son of "Michael Sr" - that is also a plus.
All this is in the data base:
https://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?db=hwrdwl
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello Patrick,
I am interested in this discussion as I am a descendant of Michael Waldrop. I do not know much of the research. Only what I found from Geni and find a grave. Thank you for sharing this.
This is my connection as he is my 8th great grandfather according to the path in Geni.
https://www.geni.com/path/Jamey-Balester+is+related+to+Michael-Wald...
Hi Jamey Balester, Thanks for responding and absolutely! Please join in.
The Links I shared are all from HOWARD WALDROP. If you read all that i've posted, Howard considers himself as the oldest last guard.... That group spent a tremendous amount of time and effort getting everything verified they could.
However, they do not have the tools that these sites today are coming out with and I really like the Connection Path tool on Geni. Problem I am having is that with so many errors, anything you get won't be correct and I am hoping that we get a lot more people involved in this.
Here is the Link again to the WALDROP main site for that Project:
http://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?db=hwrdwl
Also, FTDNA has a WALDROP PROJECT GROUP for the Y-DNA testing (men) by the same group.
I hope you follow this discussion and review the material. Maybe we can get this straight.
Patrick
Of course we can get it straight and keep it straight, that's what we have curators for!
Post a profile that's ready to be made into a Master Profile (detailed, sourced, documented, merged dups, etc) and ask for the family grouping to be made MP. On this discussion or more randomly on the discussion
https://www.geni.com/discussions/166171
If you a profile disconnected from another and can't do it yourself, post the links (the Geni URLs) here, or more randomly to
https://www.geni.com/discussions/172007
Be explicit.
For example, disconnect Y as son of X, not his kid, ref in profile "about."
Jamey knows the drill on this, you know the genealogy, and Rootsweb could get "fixed" again any time ....
Here are TWO NEW Emails from Howard and Carol Ann WALDROP of the Waldrop Project..... The first one is Carol Ann, 2nd is from Howard.
***NOTE: When Carol Ann mentions PDF 1 Page 1, or PDF 2, PDF 3, etc. she is referring to the PDF PROFILES I SENT HER on each of the WALDROP MEN after KATHERINE WALDROP, daughter of EDMUND WALDROP. I actually did not rename the file from the name the system gave it so pick the dates out and individual it is corresponding to:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
from Carol Ann WALDROP:
OK, my Hotmail got tired of waiting before I saw PDF 5 and 6. But, I think I can safely say 'ditto' PDF 4 to answer them.
Here's my take on 1, 2, 3 and 5. I just don't agree with a lot of 4.
PDF 1 Page 1 - Luke that married Christian was on 1748 Granville Co., NC Tax List. Luke, Jr. first on Granville Co., NC Tax List in 1766, so born 1750 in Granville Co., NC. Not Amelia Co., VA.
His Will names children Sarah, Mary, Asa and wife, Mary. Ignores 5 of children here. Why? His brothers didn't. They named all their children, dead, alive and married.
Page 2 - Page 1 says he went to Rutherford 1780, page 2 says he was in Laurens 1790.
PDF 2 Page 1 - Amelia Co., VA was established in 1735. Deed in Laurens says Jechonias Waldrop sold land 'willed to him by his father Luke'. Same deed says 'Luke bought land in 1772' My money says he died and was buried in Laurens (which was then Cravens or 96 Dist).
I believe he could be son of Michael, but not Michael and Sarah. The Michael and Sarah I know were in Orange Co., NC. Michael and son, Michael got Land Grants on S'burg side of Enoree in 1766-1772? era. We call Luke brother of this Michael, Joseph and James, but have no proof.
Page 2 - We have Luke in Hanover, but not William and Mary Co., VA. He was on every Tax List 1748-1770 except 1756. (That 1749 & 1755 comes from Bret Holcombe's book. The actual Tax Lists are extant at the NC Archives)
Died in Amelia? I don't think so.
I believe he had children when he came to Granville Co., NC in 1748. There is room for more children if you look at each tax list and when sons appeared at age 16, then, consider a child born every two years, there is room for some girls.
PDF 3 - Here is as far as I have stretched my imagination...Michael was in York Co., VA in 1672 with John Keene and Thomas Bell. Ten years later, Claiborne cashed in grants for transporting Michael Waldrop and Thomas Bell. I call this the same Michael. Seventeen years later, Michael got a grant of 90 acres in King William Co., VA. The Crown balked because the land he and others received had been set aside for the Pamunkey Indians. Five years later, in 1704, Michael bought 100 acres from Francis Arnold in King William Co., VA. He was buying back land he had sold to Arnold. That could be he had tried to sell the 90 acres to Arnold and called it 100, then, learned that he really didn't own it. Or, I could be missing a land purchase. I don't know. It's just a sighting (footprint) in 1704 King William Co., VA to me. Eight years later, in 1712, Michael received a 100 acre grant for transporting Hancock and Pompett (50 acres for each). The next year, 1713, the Crown settled the Pamunkey Indian land dispute and gave Michael the 90 acres.
Now, we want to make this Michael the father of Michael and Luke and James and Joseph, but he's getting old, so we give him a son, Michael to father these kids. James grows up and goes to Caroline Co., VA and dies there in 1747. Michael goes to Orange Co., NC for a while, then, he and his son Michael get land grants in S'burg, SC in 1768 and 1771. Then, he dies. Luke goes to Hanover Co., VA, Granville Co., NC and on to Laurens Co., SC and died in the late 1770s. Joseph goes to Amelia Co., VA and lives happily ever after, dying in 1775.
That's all the imagination I have. I can't deal with Sir William...hahahaha. Won't even try until I can nail down some of my imaginings between 1672 and 1800.
PDF 5 - This reads like the writings of James Marion Waldrop. He made his living as a radio announcer, can you tell?
Carol Ann
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From HOWARD WALDROP:
Hi,
Links to notes and families at the bottom.
Family group sheets do not like blank boxes; and some people have a problem with: "I do not know".
So, they guess.
Then, that guess becomes a "fact".
It gets into the system. Not only does the guess become a "fact", the identity of the person who made the guess falls away; so when yu ask, "Where does that come from?", the answer amounts to "I do not know".
All that happens in genealogy.
It happened in your line of Waldrop.
Those names of children for Luke jr come from a FGS of about 1955. We have a copy of it.
Below is what amounts to proof that Edmond is a son of Luke:
According to Census records, Luke Jr. had at least 7 children, who are beleived to have been Sarah Ann, Mahala Christian, Edmund, James Searcy, Mary, Asa, and Luke M. Waldrop. In the 1800 census for Rutherford Co., NC., Luke Jr.'s household had a male and female 25-46, 3 males 10-16, 1 male 16-26, and 2 females 10-16. Only three children were named in the will of Luke Waldrop II. These were Asa and two daughers. We know there were other children; therefore, the omission of Luke's other children's names must have been deliberate. It is possible that Luke Jr. was following an early custom whereby a father who could afford to do so, and Luke SR. and his sons could afford it, gave his daughters their shares of inheritance when they married, and gave his sons their shares to buy land sometime after they reached the age of majority. Joseph, brother of Luke Jr. did this, and so did their father, Luke SR., thereby setting a precedent. In most cases the names of those children who already had received their shares were omitted from the father's Will, but in some cases, the father made it clear by stating that those whose names were omitted had already received their portions. I have no proof, but I believe this is why James Searcy Waldrop's name, as well as the other 3 children, do not appear in the Will of Luke JR., his father. At this time, I believe that James Searcy Waldrop was the son of Luke Waldrop Jr. --- jd
Pretty thin stuff.
It is, of course, much easier to accept the conventional wisdom; and Edmond is a son of Luke jr.
That means that you discount the will ( see explantion above); find "Luke M", find Mahala; find Asa and Sarah.
Asa is a blind veteran and Sarah was living with him. Asa ended up in the poor house. Where was Edmond, eh?
Who is "luke M"? We did not find him.
Mahala was, more likely than not, a widow of a Waldrop.
We think that she married John, son of jechonias. John died; she was his widow.
A daughter, Mahala had two husbands: Anson Nelson and Jackson Pack.
All this is in the data base.
If Edmond is not a son of Luke jr, whose son is he?
Unknown.
'Tis a puzzlement.
Howard
https://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=hwrd...
https://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=hwrd...
https://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=hwrd...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are "SO MANY" discrepancies here I don't even know where to begin..... I'm truly disappointed. I had such high hopes for GENI's way of doing things but this really isn't any different than the button pushers on Ancestry.
@Erica Howton: I know it would be much easier for you that I point out each and every error or disagreed data I see, but since I am relatively new to the WALDROP Line beyond that of Edmund Waldrop and Katherine Waldrop and how she ties in with me, I'm afraid I am no help other than delivering information from people I know who have done a tremendous amount of accurate work on the WALDROPS.
What has begun to really irritate me is what I now call Button Pushers... Those that find someone that "seems" to match the individual they are searching for and without any regard at all to accuracy, without any verification of documentation or supporting sourcing, they just "PUSH THE BUTTON" and TADAAAAA..... INSTANT FAMILY.... DRIVES ME NUTS!!!!!!!!!
I spend countless hours tracking down things to support my entries only to find BS work where things have been copied incorrectly over and over and over.....
Unfortunately, Howard and Carol Ann feel a lot of what is said on these profiles for the Waldrops has indeed been copied.
That is why I sent mail to ALL of the managers controlling the WALDROP SURNAME..... THEY need to be the ones to step in here and let's get this straightened out.
I had a lead where Katherine Waldrop is showing a Tie to Lt. Col. William Polk which would make me very happy if true..... Now I can't trust this data....
But, I am trying to help so please accept that way.... I'm just disappointed right now....
Private User
Fantastic!! Would love to see it... If you don't mind, when you are copying to this thread, would you mind sending the PDF to my email: Pthompson38@bellsouth.net
Thanks Jamey,
Jamey - try to upload the PDF file as a document to Your gg, set to public, then everyone can work with it, tag to the profiles mentioned.
One thought is to use create a branch to create a new clean tree. Then make those Master Profiles, and then merge the existing Geni profiles into them. Faster, easier, cleaner.
If there’s a rootsweb database with a proven tree, we can copy that over using the SmartCopy chrome add on (free, and now available to All Geni members).
Hello @Erica Howton, that is a great idea and as I just jumped on Geni here I was thinking of how to load it to one of the Waldrop Profiles. My only problem is where it came from.
I will get backt to you guys and let you know what happens.
@Patrick H Thompson, I will, as I said, try to post to the profile.
Good work, Jamey. I’m following the document
https://www.geni.com/documents/view?doc_id=6000000075013257857&
It’s on the “media” tab and can also be seen under “sources” for the profiles tagged to it.
It can be seen in entirety here
https://media.geni.com/p13/c4/75/dc/3c/53444847637b7a81/waldrop_ori...
This may be helpful if you haven’t worked with Geni documents before
https://www.geni.com/blog/how-to-make-documents-useful-321311.html
Thanks Ladies!!! Mannnnnnn, scared me for a Second!!! I saw that big "Due to Increasing Server Costs" sign on the first page and I was like, "Oh No"....... hahahaha.... But I saw the rest... Thanks again.
I too have have some Lineage Reports directly from Howard Waldrop. They are by Family Group. I will get them uploaded on here today. However, because they are in Family Groups, do you suggest that I add them individually to each one? and then copy the Links here? Remember, my WALDROP adventure is just beginning so others, like myself, are not accustomed to all the Waldrop Players yet. How do I ensure everybody has the opportunity to get a copy?
@JameyBalester Regarding your PDF you uploaded.... I sent it to Howard and here is what he had to say:
GWWGEN.COM
is Gary Watson.
He is a descendant of Joseph Waldrop ( who went to Christian Co KY and Crawford Co IL), who was a son of Luke sr.
He does good work.
But, he is not a Waldrop researcher; just his line of Waldrop and Waldrops who went to Christian and IL.
Howard
@Patrick, Thank you for taking the time to share the document with Howard. I too tried to search the URL and got the same message. Even if he is not a Waldrop Researcher, he is a descendant and looks like he did some research enough to include many of my exsisitng relatives and their ancestors. I will keep it at face value for not and see what else you have to add to the Waldrop tree.
Good to know who compiled the PDF as it was a mystery and I forgot where I found it.
Thank you.
https://media.geni.com/p13/d6/80/a8/3c/5344484765a24b04/shadrack_li...
There is the complete line on "SHADRACK WALDROP" as far as it is known by Howard & Carol Ann Waldrop.
np Jamey.... I wanted to see if he knew who's work it was myself... Though he did point out that Gary is not a Waldrop Researcher, I think he is trying to say that Gary doesn't dedicate all his time to just Waldrops. He did say that Gary does good work too... so that's a good thing...
by the way, if you have something specific you want to know, feel free to contact Howard Directly. He has already said he will be happy to try and help.
No Blog and not on Geni but the Waldrop File i listed for Roots web at the top of this post, is all Howard & Carol Ann's work. And he is on WIKI TREE too.
Also, Carol Ann has the Waldrops somewhere in her line as well. So when they married, they teamed up some time in the 80s and started really diving into the Waldrop Line. Back when records were obtained by going to the Court House and the like.
Howard has told me several times to invite anyone who wants to discuss the Waldrop Line to contact him. He is a nice guy and will give you all the info he has.
As for source documents, you will find most on Roots or wiki tree.
Let me know if there is a specific line you want. I may already have it.
I got started making a Master Profile so we can correct the Waldrop link.
- I tagged the register report / source / cited to Shadrack Waldrop
- I used the Ahnentafel link at https://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=hwrd... to make a family report in the overview
- I usually put in a comments / sources section for profiles, but perhaps leave that to you? I'd like to get going with disconnects or moving profiles around as need be
- Did you want to make a mother Elizabeth profile based on https://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=hwrd... just add her!