Ifor ap Llewelyn - Correct Parents?

Started by Debbie Gambrell on Sunday, October 4, 2020
Problem with this page?

Participants:

Profiles Mentioned:

Showing all 11 posts
10/4/2020 at 10:26 AM

Despite all the documentation in the profile for the following parents, this Ifor is connected to other parents and I'm just wondering why.

Best documented parents seem to be:

Llywelyn ap Bledri1 b. c 1200

Mother Nest ferch Hywel "Felyn"1 b. c 1210

https://thesignsofthetimes.com.au/56/680779.htm

This site has him born 1240 rather than 1210:

https://our-royal-titled-noble-and-commoner-ancestors.com/p4878.htm...

The only site I found that has the parents he is currently connected to has no sources listed:

https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/GS28-8LV/ivor%2Fifor-ap-llewe...

10/4/2020 at 1:37 PM

I hadn't gotten to this piece of the Welsh Genealogies yet, but I'm happy to segue.

What has happened is that a grandson has been put in place of his grandfather.

I will go fix things.

Thanks!

10/4/2020 at 1:49 PM

I have the line in as Bartrum gives it, but the dates are problematic.

Steven Mitchell Ferry -- do you know how Llewelyn ap Bleddri fits in as dates? It looks like some generations are missing from the old genealogies --- where does Wolcott put him?

10/4/2020 at 4:58 PM

Wolcott has not yet addressed him. The info in the About section is problematic. But based on a date for Ifor Bach of 1110, Ifor Bach's great granddaughter, Nest ferch Hywel Felyn, would be dated to c. 1210. Her husband Llewelyn ap Bleddri, would be expected around 1195, which would be more in keeping with the death date in Llewelyn's profile. However, Bleddri Latimer is at 1090, so this Llewelyn ap Bleddri could not be his son.

What are the pertinent Bartrum pages?

10/4/2020 at 7:13 PM

Sorry!

They are naturally in the same collection — Cydifor Fawr.

Llewelyn ap Bledri — https://cadair.aber.ac.uk/dspace/bitstream/handle/2160/5130/cydifor...

Llewelyn ab Ifor — https://cadair.aber.ac.uk/dspace/bitstream/handle/2160/5227/Cydifor...

10/5/2020 at 6:26 AM

If you'll visit Bartrum's Cydifor 1 (https://cadair.aber.ac.uk/dspace/bitstream/handle/2160/5209/Cydifor...) you'll notice 2 things. First, he combines two generations into Bleddri Latimer. Second, he assigns Llewelyn ap Bleddri to Gen 6, while Bleddri is at Gen 2. So even Bartrum knew something was amiss. Wolcott has stated that Bartrum was never specifically trying to accurately assign dates, but was more interested in establishing familial connection. It looks like Bartrum knew Llewelyn was descended from Bleddri, he just wasn't sure how.

10/5/2020 at 6:36 AM

That’s what it looks like indeed.

I think we need to cut Bledri off, lock down, and add explanatory note.

10/5/2020 at 11:20 AM

Anne Brannen and Steven Mitchell Ferry thanks for looking into this and sorting it out. I appreciate you!

10/5/2020 at 11:34 AM

You are quite welcome.

10/5/2020 at 1:32 PM

Debbie Gambrell You're welcome. It's what we do, even at the peril of lost sanity and domestic tranquility.

10/6/2020 at 6:13 AM

Anne Brannen Wolcott does chart a Rhydderch ap Bleddri Latimer, c. 1120, so I would suggest cutting Llewelyn from this line, with explanation.

Showing all 11 posts

Create a free account or login to participate in this discussion