With all due respect, Debbie, I belong to the Martin Surname Group, where I have numerous matches. We are trying every which way to prove the lineage, so I humbly disagree with you that Geni is not the place to discuss this. Just the opposite. We pay big bucks to belong to its parent company, and thus we have a right to ask questions and participate in discussions. I have 229 cousins following my private Facebook genealogy page, and many of us have spent decades trying to find our paternal ancestors and especially to find our immigrant forefather.
I have been researching my family since the 1970s. I have spent a fortune on testing. I have taken Advanced YDNA training. What I want to see are the facts. This profile has none, yet it is labeled a Master Profile and has incredibly important information like a YDNA haplogroup and a possible immigration clue. Where is the sourcing? Someone in Geni land put up this information.
For example, the YDNA is attributed to R-BY27212 based on a "private" tester at 67 Markers. I know for a fact that this cannot be possible. A 67 Markers test - which is no longer sold - only would show that the YDNA haplogroup is R-M198. The only way it could be R-BY27212 is if the tester took the BigY-500 (the old version) or BigY-700 (the new version). So why isn't that information relevant? It certainly is of great interest to the dozen men who are trying to find their common ancestor.
In fact, Debbie, I would propose that a YDNA discussion is of great interest if not only for proving a paper trail but also a genetic one.
Respectfully disagreeing with you.